Don't Miss New Posts!
Subscribe Now!

Get notified automatically whenever a new post is published on Click Consultants!
Affiliate Marketing RSS Feed

A/B Split Testing Versus ABAB Split Testing

December 11th, 2009 Derek

a-b-split-testIt’s amazing to me that after writing about Split Testing so many different times on this blog, that I still receive email’s daily asking me the best methods for split testing, different ways of split testing, which options work best, etc.

If you’ve ever spoken to me via social media sites or via Instant Messaging for any length of time, you’ll know that I’m not the type of person to say one method is better than the other.  Unfortunately in this business, certain methods work for some people, while completely different methods work for others.  There is no clear cut solution or any clear cut path to follow in order to succeed in affiliate marketing.

However, I received an email about two weeks ago with a very specific question about split testing.  I responded to the person with the same advice I’m about to talk about in this blog post.  The email asked…

I know split testing is important, in fact, from what I understand it may be the single most important aspect I can do in affiliate marketing to influence the scaling process of my campaigns.  However, I’ve seen several methods for split testing and I was wondering which method worked best.  Some sites I’ve read say that you should split test two versions of whatever your testing at the same time, while others suggest split testing one type one day and then another the next day.  Which method do you feel would have the greatest impact on my split testing efforts?

Now, when I started split testing, I always used the A/B method of split testing which means that you split test two variations at the exact same time giving both equal exposure.  In fact, it’s not something I have even really thought about thus my reason for never writing a blog post about it before now.  However, after thinking about it, I felt that it was worthy of a blog post because I do believe there is a very clear cut way of doing it that will yield the best results!

The other, most common, method you see affiliates use is the AB split testing method.  The only difference between the two is that with the A/B method you are split testing both things at the same exact time giving them both equal exposure.  With the AB method you are split testing them at different times, or days.  For example, you may split test a landing page on Monday, document the results, and then put up a new landing page on Tuesday, compare the results and pick the best one.

The downside with the AB split testing model is that unfortunately data can be very different on different days and even on the same day but morning vs. evening.  Some campaigns do really well during the evenings, but horrible during the mornings, if you are running one page in the morning and one in the evening, your better landing page may actually be the one that you are running in the mornings but because conversions suck for your niche in the mornings, it looks like your landing page doesn’t do well at all.

However, if you are using the A/B method you know that both items you are split testing are getting the same exact data.  They are sharing visitors equally and both are being displayed both in the morning, afternoon, and evening.  This insures that you aren’t receiving data that is skewed because of changes in the visitors you receive throughout the day.

Now, as I said in the opening paragraphs of this blog post, not every method works best for everyone.  There is one other method that I’ve found works decent and that is the ABAB method.

This works just like the AB method, but there is one major difference.  You split test landing page one on Monday, then landing page two on Tuesday, however, you then continue on giving each one more time.  So you’d split test landing page one on Wednesday for the second time, and then split test landing page two on Thursday for a second time.

Personally I still don’t believe this is the best method and when compared with the A/B split testing method, I’m not sure why you’d choose it, however, there are some that believe that the ABAB method is the best choice.  In fact, it is a common way of split testing in other fields like Pyschology.  These fields use the ABAB method for most experiments.

Ultimately the choice is yours, however, I’d highly recommend going with the A/B method or at the very least the ABAB method.  Using the AB method is in my opinion simply being lazy and it will impact your business in a very negative way!

Popularity: 9% [?]

Related Posts

You’re an Idiot if Your Not Split Testing
Which Offer Should I Use?
Split Testing Landing Pages – It’s Easy!

RSS feed | Trackback URI

15 Comments »

Comment by Jeff
2009-12-11 10:15:12

At first I thought this post was going to be about ABBA.

Comment by used tires
2010-04-14 05:07:22

Haha, I thought the same too! Showing my age here, lol.

Till then,

Jean

 
 
Comment by Derek
2009-12-11 10:29:43

Haha, nope, no worries! I wouldn’t do that to my readers :P

 
Comment by Yacht Davits
2009-12-14 18:26:02

It’s unique idea of split testing. I like your method of testing.

 
Comment by jayesh
2009-12-14 21:15:26

hi,

Ultimately the choice is yours, however, I’d highly recommend going with the A/B method or at the very least the ABAB method.

Comment by used tires
2010-01-03 19:18:05

This comment reply sounds like… humm… whats the right word… a straight copy? lol wow.

Anyways its great that you decided to follow up that email question here on your blog, I got some good take away from it and I am sure many will too, and plus… now you can just link to this in case you get more emails about this lol.

Till then,

Jean

 
 
Comment by Link Wheel
2010-01-03 15:44:20

Hello, We do quite a bit of split testing and A/B is the only way to go for accurate results.
Regards, David Pagotto

 
Comment by Aluminum Case
2010-01-06 05:26:14

I agree with your points about split testing. For it to be effective, you need to take away outside variables that could affect things like day of the week or time of day. To get an accurate comparison, you need to give each version an equal chance.

What do you do when your conversion rates are extremely low? When you only get 1 sale out of hundreds of visitors, using different landing pages might not make much difference. The conversion rates may still come down to other factors such as price.

 
Comment by Aluminum Case
2010-02-16 08:33:11

Well I was hoping for a response, but I guess you’re pretty busy. I guess my only option is to use a larger data sample with a longer time period.

 
Comment by Mark Acutt
2010-02-18 08:52:57

Hi Aluminum Case,

I came across this post and found it interesting. There’s obviously A/B split testing (which I use often) as well as MVT (Multi Variant Split Testing – easily setup via Google Website Optimizer).

Anyway, MVT is a different ballpark as it swaps and test various different areas of your web page to find the best combination and highest conversion rate. It’s really cool and works well (even in blogs).

Regarding your issue: What do you do when your conversion rates are extremely low?

Try something totally different. Monitor what your competition are doing. Use tools (like PPC Bully) to see how long your competitors ads have been around. A good profitability indication is if the ads have been around for 30 days or more.

Nobody will continue advertising is they’re losing money — right?

Then draft a new landing page/s around what appears to be working.

Please don’t click on PPC ads, copy the URL’s and paste it into a new Browser window.

You should be able to get a 2% – 3% conversion rate. Some of my sites get 5%+.

There are many different styles/types of landing pages. Be careful or ‘review’ only page – Google frowns upon these and your QS (Quality Score) will suffer severely!

I usually use PRESELL type sites… lots of unique content targeting the visitor. Essentially I pre-qualify the visitor before they hit the vendor’s sale page (it also keeps Google happy and PPC bid prices low).

This doesn’t mean it works in ALL markets, but works very well in most.

Also, make sure you now comply with the latest FTC policies (December 2009) or you could be shut down as an affiliate.

I hope this helps.

Best,
Mark Acutt

Comment by Aluminum Case
2010-03-23 07:21:55

Thanks for the advice Mark. I wouldn’t say our conversion rate is horrible. I just find it tough to test things when the conversion rate is below 2-3%. Sometimes we have to look at factors other than just the sales page design. In our case we offer a niche product but we get a lot of traffic that is looking for slightly different products. I just know that we would have to test things for quite a while to get accurate results. There will always be people who won’t buy from you regardless of how good your design is and there will always be people who will buy regardless of how bad your design is. So you need a big enough data sample to dilute those cases.

 
 
2010-02-22 21:18:14

Good information about split testing.I guess many marketers are not doing split testing and are not getting the results they were looking for.I will bookmark and share this with my friends.

 
Comment by used tires
2010-03-09 19:03:58

Yea, it seems like it’s not being looked at seriously by quite a few marketers for now but hopefully in the future, they’ll realize it’s usefulness. Just takes time for everything to catch on, I guess.

Till then,

Jean

 
Comment by Makeup Store
2010-03-10 12:53:27

I’ve only just started split testing recently, however, I have seen excellent results. It just takes time to debug and figure out the correct method to follow.

 
2010-04-01 14:43:32

Agree with your view that “In fact,ABAB method is a common way of split testing in other fields like Pyschology. These fields use the ABAB method for most experiments”. I will consider your recommendation to use the ABAB method.Thanks for sharing great blog.Worth to read your blog and appreciate it.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Trackback responses to this post